Euthanasia may be voluntary, non voluntary and involuntary.

However, it may be argued euthanasia has emerged with the purpose of reclaiming that right.

There are two problems here - the definition of "terminal" and the changes that have already taken place to extend euthanasia or assisted suicide to those who aren't "terminally ill.

The right to live; the right to choose to live or die should not only be a right allocated for bodied individuals of sound mind but for all human beings.

When reading about euthanasia and having to make the decision whether or not I support or oppose it, I came to the conclusion that I support euthanasia - but only in certain cases....

If euthanasia were legal, how would people think of doctors who practiced this form of homicide.

Although we believe that a true rational understanding of moral issues can only ultimately be grounded on fundamental principles, which ultimately derive from religious faith, we believe that there are many many rational non-religious arguments for banning “voluntary euthanasia”, in response to Dr Wood (Times ) who says

2. Euthanasia can become a means of health care cost containment

Active euthanasia is the purposeful killing of a person by a medical professional either by administering a lethal injection or by prohibiting necessary means of survival.

3. Euthanasia will only be voluntary

When terminally ill patient consented to end his or her life, it is called voluntary euthanasia.

Euthanasia may lead to a situation where the desirability of a person will determine if he has to live or not, as through Euthanasia we will have broken the rule of sanctity of life, regardless the individual.

Euthanasia can be unresponsive, (inactive) or active.

In passive Euthanasia, the person on whom the decision on whether to let live or to leave to die is usually not consulted and the decision to let that person die usually excludes the person who is being pushed toward the cliff of death.


Voluntary Euthanasia

World War I, a war fought to "destroy the axis of evil ? and to resolve conflicts between belligerent countries, brought nothing but turmoil and numerous dilemmas to the warring nations; politically and economically. Immediately after the war, many people thought the war had made a safe environment for democracy in all countries. Peace was thought to have been restored among the world. People's views of the world were tainted and many nations began to struggle.
In the years following the end of World War I, Americans found themselves in an era, known as the "Roaring Twenties, ? where the people simply wished to detach themselves from the troubles of Europeans and the rest of the world. During the twenties, the economy was prosperous and most people found better ways to improve their lifestyle and enjoy life, yet not everyone reaped the benefits of this era. The Eighteenth Amendment, or the Prohibition Act, banned the manufacturing, sale of or transportation of liquor, causing breweries and saloons a great demise; however, it reaped profit for bootleggers. This also meant a rise in organized crime. Callous criminals, such as Al Capone, caused an estimated 60 million dollars worth of damage. Although Capone was indeed a criminal, he shared his wealth with charities, and provided the public with goods and services that they wanted. In the 1920's business was an obsession. Economic expansion created booming business profits, which in turn raised the standard of living for most Americans. Large businesses were expanding. Americans were moving into a period of economic prosperity. When the American people saw that the economy was flourishing, they felt that they were on a pedestal, protected from the river of uncertainty, economic depression and the failure of the "American Dream. ? Many Americans found a way to improve their lifestyle. By 1930, almost thirteen percent of farmers had tractors. The use of labor saving machin

Is There a Difference Between Passive and Active Euthanasia?

Ethically speaking, the idea of Euthanasia goes against the basic tenets of life as a right, in that all life is holy and needs be not only protected but propagated too.

Is There a Difference Between Passive and Active ..

There are proponents who argue that passive Euthanasia can be regulated. The argument is that Euthanasia happens and will always be here with us, and the best thing to do is to set meaningful laws that will control it. In fact some countries such as Netherlands already have. Further argument is given the death is a relief and if man overcame the fear of it then it would be possible to embrace Euthanasia.